Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more infromation

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ochoa, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kearney, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ochoa, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kearney, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Long-Term Reduction in the Cost of Nutritional Intervention Achieved by a Nutrition Support Service

Juan B. Ochoa, MD

Barbara Magnuson, PharmD

Marjorie Swintowsky, RD

Theresa Loan, PhD

Bernard Boulanger, MD

Craig McClain, MD

Paul Kearney, MD

Background: Short-term effectiveness of Nutrition Support Services (NSS) has been previously evaluated. However, long-term clinical and economic impact is unknown. This study tests the hypothesis that the NSS improves patient care while reducing costs and that the service should be maintained on a long-term basis. Methods: Prospective monitoring of the effectiveness of nutrition support was done during the whole length of the study. Parameters studied included: (1) use of the appropriate route of nutritional delivery; (2) physician compliance with the recommendations given by the NSS; (3) Monitoring of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) waste; and (4) evaluation of costs. Results: A dramatic change in the route of delivery of nutrients occurred when NSS was instituted. This coincided with increased physician awareness that an enteral route for nutrient delivery could be safely obtained in most patients thus avoiding an indiscriminate use of TPN. The initial trend in reduction of TPN observed in the first year (46% reduction in TPN in one year, p < .001) of the institution of the NSS has continued through the years (78.6% reduction in the use of TPN by 1999, p < .001). The use of enteral nutrition (EN) increased proportionately. A reduction in TPN waste from 493 bags in 1991 to 34 bags in 1999 was also observed. Compliance with recommendations forwarded by the NSS is now above 90% compared with 50% in 1991. TPN cost in 1991 was $513,246.00, which was reduced to $195,176.00 by 1999. We believe that significant savings in the cost of nutrition support have occurred as a result of the implementation of a NSS. Conclusions: Long-term maintenance of an NSS is warranted. The NSS provides constant surveillance and interventions regarding the appropriate nutrition support route, the adequacy of its use, and continuously minimizes waste.

Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Vol. 15, No. 4, 174-180 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/088453360001500404


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
G. L. Gurgueira, H. P. Leite, J. A. de Aguiar Carrazedo Taddei, and W. B. de Carvalho
Outcomes in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Before and After the Implementation of a Nutrition Support Team
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, May 1, 2005; 29(3): 176 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]