Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more infromation

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zauner, C
Right arrow Articles by Schneeweiss, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zauner, C
Right arrow Articles by Schneeweiss, B
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Current Literature

Similar Metabolic Responses to Standardized Total Parenteral Nutrition of Septic and Nonseptic Critically Ill Patients

C Zauner
BI Schuster
B Schneeweiss

Department of Internal Medicine IV, University of Vienna, Austria

Background: Nutritional support is an important link between the response to injury and recovery in critical illness. Objective: Our goal was to evaluate energy and substrate metabolism in septic and nonseptic critically ill patients in the resting state and during the administration of standardized total parenteral nutrition. Design: This was a prospective, clinical cohort study of 25 consecutively admitted critically ill patients either with (n = 14) or without (n = 11) sepsis who received total parenteral nutrition. Resting energy expenditure was measured on days 0, 2, and 7 by indirect calorimetry. Energy and substrate balances were calculated on days 2 and 7. Results: Resting energy expenditure was not significantly different between septic and nonseptic patients on day 0 (2.65 ± 0.49 and 2.36 ± 0.56 kJ x min–1 x m–2, respectively). Energy balances were positive for both groups on days 2 (0.68 ± 0.4 and 0.74 ± 0.6 kJ x min–1 x m–2, respectively; NS) and 7 (0.65 ± 0.3 and 0.78 ± 0.5 kJ x min–1 x m–2, respectively; NS). Substrate balances were not significantly different between groups on days 0, 2, and 7. Resting energy expenditure on day 0 was negatively correlated with the severity of illness in septic patients only (r = –0.58, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Metabolic changes were not significantly different between septic and nonseptic critically ill patients during the administration of standardized total parenteral nutrition. A disease-specific macronutrient composition of total parenteral nutrition formulas does not seem to be necessary in either septic or nonseptic critically ill patients.

Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Vol. 17, No. 1, 43-44 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/011542650201700143a


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?