Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more infromation

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vanek, V. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vanek, V. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Invited Reviews

Ins and Outs of Enteral Access. Part 1: Short-Term Enteral Access

Vincent W. Vanek, MD, FACS, CNSP

Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth Health Center, Youngstown, Ohio; and Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Rootstown, Ohio

Correspondence: Correspondence: Dr Vincent W. Vanke, MD, CNSP, FA, Saint Elizabeth Hospital, 1044 Belmont Avenue, PO Box 1790, Youngs-town, OH 44501-1790. Electronic mail may be sent to vince_vanek{at}hmis.org.

Proper selection of the type of enteral access in a given clinical situation is important to maximize the benefit to the patient and minimize the discomfort to the patient, the morbidity and mortality, and the cost. This decision is based on whether or not the patient needs short-term (<4–6 weeks) or long-term enteral nutrition support. This article focuses on short-term access including nasogastric (NG) and nasoenteric (NE) tubes and reviews each of these enteral access tubes along with their indications, contraindications, advantages, and disadvantages.

Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Vol. 17, No. 5, 275-283 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0115426502017005275
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nutr Clin PractHome page
S. Mahadeva, A. Malik, I. Hilmi, C.-S. Qua, C.-H. Wong, and K.-L. Goh
Transnasal Endoscopic Placement of Nasoenteric Feeding Tubes: Outcomes and Limitations in Non-Critically Ill Patients
Nutr Clin Pract, April 1, 2008; 23(2): 176 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nutr Clin PractHome page
G. Cresci and J. Mellinger
The History of Nonsurgical Enteral Tube Feeding Access
Nutr Clin Pract, October 1, 2006; 21(5): 522 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nutr Clin PractHome page
A. D. Guidroz and A. J. Chaudhary
Enteral Access in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
Nutr Clin Pract, December 1, 2004; 19(6): 610 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nutr Clin PractHome page
A. C. Bernard, B. Magnuson, B. J. Tsuei, M. Swintosky, S. Barnes, and P. A. Kearney
Defining and Assessing Tolerance in Enteral Nutrition
Nutr Clin Pract, October 1, 2004; 19(5): 481 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]