This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Braga, M Articles by Di Carlo, V Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Braga, M Articles by Di Carlo, V Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Nutritional Approach in Malnourished Surgical Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study

Department of Surgery, San Raffale University, Milan, Italy

Hypothesis: Perioperative administration of a supplemented enteral formula may decrease postoperative morbidity. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: Department of surgery at a university hospital. Patients: One hundred ninety-six registered malnourished patients (weight loss > or = 10%) who were candidates for major elective surgery for malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. Intervention: After randomization (n = 150), one group received postoperative enteral feeding with a standard diet within 12 hours of surgery (control group; n = 50). Another group orally received 1 L/d for 7 consecutive days of a liquid diet enriched with arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, and RNA (preoperative group; n = 50). After surgery, patients were given the same standard enteral formula as the control group. A third group orally received 1 L/d for 7 consecutive days of the enriched liquid diet. After surgery, patients were given enteral feeding with the same enriched formula (perioperative group; n = 50). Main Outcome Measures: Postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. Results: The 3 groups were comparable for baseline demographics, biochemical markers, comorbidity factors, and surgical variables. The intent-to-treat analysis showed that the total number of patients with complications was 24 in the control group, 14 in the preoperative group, and 9 in the perioperative group (p = .02, control group versus perioperative group). Postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter in the preoperative (13.2 days) and perioperative (12.0 days) groups than in the control group (15.3 days) (p = .01 and p = .001, respectively, versus the control group). Conclusion: Perioperative immunonutrition seems to be the best approach to support malnourished patients with cancer.

Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Vol. 17, No. 5, 325-326 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0115426502017005325


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?