Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more infromation

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haderslev, K.
Right arrow Articles by Staun, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Haderslev, K.
Right arrow Articles by Staun, M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Current Literature

Effect of Cyclical Intravenous Clodronate Therapy on Bone Mineral Density and Markers of Bone Turnover in Patients Receiving Home Parenteral Nutrition

KV Haderslev
L Tjellesen
HA Sorensen
M Staun

Department of Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; and the Department of Endocrinology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark

Background: Patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) because of intestinal failure are at high risk of developing osteoporosis. Objective: We studied the effect of the bisphosphonate clodronate on bone mineral density (BMD) and markers of bone turnover in HPN patients. Design: A 12-mo, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to study the effect of 1500 mg clodronate, given intravenously every 3 mo for 1 y, in 20 HPN patients with a bone mass T score of the hip or lumbar spine of less than –1. The main outcome measure was the difference in the mean percentage change in the BMD of the lumbar spine measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Secondary outcome measures included changes in the BMD of the hip, forearm, and total body and biochemical markers of bone turnover, ie, serum osteocalcin, urinary pyridinoline, and urinary deoxypyridinoline. Results: The mean (±SEM) BMD of the lumbar spine increased by 0.8 ± 2.0% in the clodronate group and decreased by 1.6 ± 2.0% in the placebo group (P = 0.43). At all secondary skeletal sites (ie, hip, total body, and distal forearm), we observed no changes or small increases in the BMD of the clodronate group. In the clodronate group, biochemical markers of bone resorption decreased significantly (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Clodronate significantly inhibits bone resorption as assessed by changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover. Although the mean BMD increased in the clodronate group, cyclic clodronate therapy failed to increase spinal BMD significantly at 12 mo.

Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Vol. 18, No. 2, 176 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0115426503018002176


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?