Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more infromation

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McClave, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, W.-K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McClave, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, W.-K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Clinical Dilemmas

When to Feed the Patient With Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Stephen A. McClave, MD* and Wei-Kuo Chang, MD{dagger}

* Departments of Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky; and{dagger} Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan

Correspondence: Stephen A. McClave, MD, Professor of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, 550 S. Jackson St., Louisville, Kentucky 40202. Electronic mail may be sent to samcclave{at}louisville.edu.

Whether to provide artificial enteral nutrition therapy to a patient with evidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) creates a difficult clinical dilemma. Concern that enteral feeding may contribute to the morbidity associated with GIB leads to delays in initiating enteral therapy or to cessation of feeding in the patient in whom artificial nutrition support has already been started. Surprisingly, evidence of GIB is not an automatic contraindication to further enteral feeding. Depending on the etiology of the GIB, enteral nutrition may protect the gut mucosa and reduce further bleeding in some patients, actually increase risk for rebleeding in other patients, or serve as a moot point with no relation to further bleeding or morbidity in still other patients. In many cases, an endoscopic evaluation is needed to distinguish the differential etiology of the GIB. The nutrition support specialist needs a full understanding of the physiology behind the varying diagnoses for GIB to know whether feedings can be initiated or continued or whether enteral feedings need to be withheld for 48–72 hours until risk for rebleeding and further morbidity is minimized.

Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Vol. 20, No. 5, 544-550 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0115426505020005544


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
C. A. Miller, S. Grossman, E. Hindley, D. MacGarvie, and J. Madill
Are Enterally Fed ICU Patients Meeting Clinical Practice Guidelines?
Nutr Clin Pract, December 1, 2008; 23(6): 642 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]