|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Tube Feeding Patients With Dementia
Ronni Chernoff, PhD, RD
Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Central Arkansas
Veterans Healthcare System, and Donald W. Reynolds Department of Geriatrics
and Institute on Aging, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little
Rock, Arkansas
Correspondence: Ronni Chernoff, PhD, RD, GRECC (182), CAVHS, 4300 W
7th Street, Little Rock, AR 72205. Electronic mail may be sent to
chernoffronni{at}uams.edu.
As the population ages, the incidence of dementia increases. All types of
dementia, whether they are reversible or irreversible, lead to loss of
intellectual function and judgment, memory impairment, and personality
changes. The skills to feed oneself, use eating utensils, and consume items
recognized as food, thereby maintaining nutrition status, may be lost as
dementia progresses. Reports indicate that nutrition status may be maintained
when patients are hand fed, but this is labor intensive and therefore
expensive. Feeding via a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube is
often chosen as an acceptable alternative. Research indicates that there is
little benefit in this population when aggressive nutrition support is
instituted. Providing tube feeding to patients with dementia does not
necessarily extend life, increase weight, or reduce the incidence of pressure
ulcers or aspiration. There are many legal and ethical issues involved in the
decision to place a feeding tube in demented patients. The primary issue in
patients with dementia may be autonomy and the right of an individual to
decide whether or not a tube should be placed at all. Legally, there is clear
precedent that the courts see the insertion of a feeding tube as extraordinary
care that the patient has the right to refuse. However, much of case law is
derived from cases of patients who were in a persistent vegetative state.
Advance directives help to determine what the patient would want for himself.
Considering all the options before the patient can no longer make decisions is
the most desirable course.
Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Vol. 21, No. 2,
142-146 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0115426506021002142

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Emley, L. Gluch, and M. Casper
Practical Strategies: Nourishing Liquid Diet
Gerontology,
July 1, 2008;
13(1):
33 - 36.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L J. Hoffer
Tube feeding in advanced dementia: the metabolic perspective
BMJ,
December 9, 2006;
333(7580):
1214 - 1215.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Barrocas
Nutrition Support and the Troubling Trichotomy: A Call to Action
Nutr Clin Pract,
April 1, 2006;
21(2):
109 - 112.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ferrie
A Quick Guide to Ethical Theory in Healthcare: Solving Ethical Dilemmas in Nutrition Support Situations
Nutr Clin Pract,
April 1, 2006;
21(2):
113 - 117.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|