This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sneve, J. Articles by Stevens, D. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sneve, J. Articles by Stevens, D. C. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Nutritional Support Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Team That Includes a Registered Dietitian in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Improved Nutrition Outcomes

From the ¹ Department of Nutrition, Food Science, and Hospitality, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, and the ² Department of Pediatrics, University of South Dakota, Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

Correspondence: Address correspondence to: Kendra Kattelmann, PhD, RD, South Dakota State University, Department of Nutrition, Food Science, and Hospitality, Box 2275A, Brookings, SD 57007; e-mail: kendra_kattelmann{at}sdstat.edu.

This study determined whether nutrition outcomes of neonates who were receiving neonatal intensive care were improved with the implementation of a fully functioning multidisciplinary team that included a registered dietitian. A medical record review was conducted of neonates with birth weights of 1500 g or less who were cared for in Sanford Children's Hospital neonatal intensive care unit from January 1 to December 31, 2001 (prior to functioning multidisciplinary team establishment) and January 1 to December 31, 2004 (subsequent to establishment of a multidisciplinary team). Data from charts in the 2 time periods were examined for differences in nutrition outcomes. Outcome variables included length of stay, birth weight, discharge weight, weight gained for specified time periods, weight at full feeds, weight gain per day, length, head circumference, and number of days to start enteral feeding. Analysis of covariance, controlling for the effect of birth weight, was used to determine differences and was considered significant at P < .05. The mean length of stay (65 days, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 48-68 vs 72 days, 95% CI: 53-73) was not different for the 2 periods. The mean weight at the beginning of enteral feeding was significantly less in the period prior to the establishment of the multidisciplinary team (1099 g, 95% CI: 955-1165 vs 1164 g, 95% CI: 1067-1211, respectively). Weight at discharge, total weight gained, total daily weight gained, daily weight gain from birth to the initiation of enteral feeds, daily weight gain from birth to full feeds, and head circumference growth were significantly greater for neonates in the postgroup than in the pre-multidisciplinary team group. Implementation of a multidisciplinary team that included a registered dietitian improved the nutrition outcomes of low birth weight infants in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Key Words: infant, newborn • infant, premature • infant, very low birth weight • premature birth • nutrition support

Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Vol. 23, No. 6, 630-634 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0884533608326140


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?