This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sungurtekin, H. Articles by Okke, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sungurtekin, H. Articles by Okke, D. Pubmed/NCBI databases Substance via MeSH Medline Plus Health Information Nutritional Support Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Nutrition Assessment in Critically Ill Patients

From the ¹ Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, and the ² Department of General Surgery, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.

Address correspondence to: Hulya Sungurtekin, Pamukkale University, Anesthesiology, 593 Sok No 13 Lalekent, Denizli 20100, Turkey; e-mail: hsungurtekin{at}yahoo.com.

Background: The aim of this study was to assess whether subjective global assessment (SGA) is useful in identifying malnutrition and outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: After obtaining institutional approval, 124 consenting patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were evaluated at admission using clinical data, SGA, height, weight, triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), mid-arm circumference (MAC), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II), and Simplified Acute Physiologic Score (SAPS). Patients were classified as well nourished, moderately malnourished, or severely malnourished with SGA. Results: According to SGA, 62% (n = 77) of the patients were classified as well nourished, 26% (n = 33) as moderately malnourished, and 11% (n = 14) as severely malnourished. Body weight, body mass index (BMI), MAC, TSF, and mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC) were lower, whereas APACHE II and SAPS II scores and mortality were higher in the malnourished groups compared with the well-nourished group. The SGA rating correlated significantly with age, body weight, percentage of weight loss, serum albumin level, APACHE II and SAPS II scores, and mortality. Anthropometrics data were correlated with SGA. Mortality rate was correlated with high APACHE II score, SAPS II score, days in the ICU and low BMI, MAMC, and serum albumin level. Conclusions: The results support that SGA is simple and may predict the patient's outcomes in the ICU.

Key Words: nutrition assessment • intensive care units • critical illness

Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Vol. 23, No. 6, 635-641 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0884533608326137


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?