Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more infromation

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, G. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Somatostatin and Its Analogs in the Short Bowel Syndrome

Gail H. Rosen, PHARMD

Nutrition Support Services, Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Maryland Medical System, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, and University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore

The use of somatostatin to manage diarrhea associated with the short gut syndrome is impractical because of its need to be given by continuous infusion and a rebound effect on stool output with cessation of therapy. Octreotide has been used more successfully to control stool and electrolyte losses in patients with shortened gastrointestinal tracts. In published series and studies, all subjects appear to decrease stool losses, but clinical benefit for longterm use is not achieved for all patients. In the patients who do respond, the need for parenteral nutrition and intravenous hydration has been decreased or eliminated. The optimal dose is unclear, but many patients respond to 50-µg injections twice daily. Several investigations noted no additional beneficial effects with escalating dosages. Adverse effects include impairment of fat absorption, which may offset the therapeutic benefits of octreotide. The patients with the greatest response appear to have the least fat malabsorption. Other adverse effects noted when using octreotide for control of the short gut syndrome include pain associated with subcutaneous injection and abdominal complaints. Other potential concerns include the effect on gallstone formation in this high-risk population and intestinal adaptation.

Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Vol. 7, No. 2, 81-85 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/011542659200700281


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?