Nutrition in Clinical Practice

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferrone, M.
Right arrow Articles by Geraci, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferrone, M.
Right arrow Articles by Geraci, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Vol. 22, No. 3, 329-339 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0115426507022003329


Invited Review

A Review of the Relationship Between Parenteral Nutrition and Metabolic Bone Disease

Marcus Ferrone, PharmD, BCNSP* and Matthew Geraci, PharmD{dagger}

* University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and {dagger} Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida

Correspondence: Marcus Ferrone, University of California, San Francisco, Drug Product Services Laboratory, 3333 California Street, Suite 420, San Francisco, CA 94118. Electronic mail may be sent to ferronem{at}pharmacy.ucsf.edu.

Metabolic bone disease (MBD) refers to the conditions that produce a diffuse decrease in bone density and strength because of an imbalance between bone resorption and bone formation. MBD can be a potential complication in patients receiving chronic parenteral nutrition (PN) therapy and the management of this condition presents a challenge for many clinicians. The etiology of PN-associated MBD is poorly understood, but traditional risk factors can include malnutrition, vitamin and mineral deficiencies, toxic contaminants in the PN solution, concomitant medications, and presence of certain disease states. Although additional studies are warranted to further elucidate the development and management of this condition, the following review discusses some of the important factors that may play a role in the genesis of PN-associated MBD and evaluates some potential strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of this complication.

Metabolic bone disease (MBD) refers to the conditions that are characterized by a diffuse decrease in bone density and strength. This loss of bone mineral density (BMD) and ensuing osteoporosis or osteomalacia can be associated with long-term parenteral nutrition (PN) administration and is a serious and enigmatic issue for patients and clinicians alike. Although a comprehensive understanding of MBD and the compromise in skeletal architecture secondary to PN is not known, its consequences can severely affect the rehabilitation of patients and their quality of life.

The true incidence of PN-associated MBD (PN-MBD) in adults remains unknown. It is estimated that 40%–100% of adult patients receiving chronic PN may have some degree of bone demineralization.13 The incidence and prevalence of PN-MBD in children are also unidentified; however, fractures and rickets have been associated with this clinical condition.4 Although bone disease can result in considerable infant morbidity, there is a paucity of data on the epidemiology of MBD in pediatrics.58


    Bone Physiology
 Top
 Bone Physiology
 Clinical Presentation and...
 Etiology and Pathophysiology
 Management
 Conclusion
 
MBD is a heterogeneous complication that may result from chronic PN therapy. To gain an appreciation for this clinical condition, an understanding of fundamental bone physiology is important. The skeletal system is a dynamic organ that provides the body with mechanical stability and structural support, in addition to protecting internal organs. It produces erythrocytes and other hematopoietic elements, serves as a reservoir of calcium and other life-supporting ions, and can bind toxins and heavy metals along its enormous mineral surface, thereby minimizing their ability to cause cellular damage.

Trabecular and cortical bones are the 2 major types of bone in the adult skeleton. Trabecular or cancellous bone surrounds the marrow and appears as fine, lacelike strands that make up the inner framework of the bones and gives bone its compressive strength. Trabecular bone makes up the major portion of the vertebrae, the ends of long bones, and the pelvis.9 Cortical bone is located around the circumference of the bone shaft and is made of thick, densely packed layers of mineralized collagen. It is responsible for giving bone its rigidity.

All bones in the body undergo constant modification and remodeling. Remodeling or bone turnover is the process by which bone is repaired and reinforced to compensate for the mechanical stress placed on the skeleton by repetitive activity. This continuous breakdown and renewal of bone consists of the balanced activity of skeletal destruction (or bone resorption) by osteoclasts and skeletal reconstruction (or bone formation) by osteoblasts.10 On an annual basis, about 4% of cortical bone is remodeled, contrasted to approximately 28% of trabecular bone.11 The intricate process of skeletal remodeling is carefully regulated by numerous factors, including parathyroid hormone (PTH), vitamin D, and serum calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus concentrations. Any disturbance in this process over time can lead to the development of MBD.


    Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis
 Top
 Bone Physiology
 Clinical Presentation and...
 Etiology and Pathophysiology
 Management
 Conclusion
 
Definitions and Clinical Presentation
MBD associated with PN may present as osteomalacia, osteopenia, or osteoporosis. Osteomalacia is a disorder of mineralization of the newly formed organic matrix, leading to soft bone. In children, this abnormal calcification of the protein matrix is referred to as rickets. Osteopenia is a state of low bone mass that is due to a decrease in bone mineralization. In the progression of MBD, the bone experiences a phase of osteopenia before leading to a greater loss of BMD or the state of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis is defined by a low total bone mass and disruption of the normal architecture of bone, resulting in increased fragility and enhanced risk of fracture. Histologically, the cortices are thinned and porous. The trabeculae are few in number, thinner, and less connected.

Most patients with PN-MBD will be asymptomatic; however, some will present with atraumatic bone pain and fractures. Biochemical parameters associated with bone formation and mineralization are often normal but may be subtly abnormal.1214 These laboratory results may reveal hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalciuria, normal 25-hydroxyvitamin D with a low 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D level, elevated serum alkaline phosphatase levels, and low to normal PTH concentrations.

Diagnosis of MBD
The diagnosis of PN-MBD is one of exclusion. Useful diagnostic tools include radiologic studies of bone and measurements of BMD and bone formation. The most common techniques used to assess trabecular BMD are dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography.15 Blood and urine tests are available that reflect increased bone resorption or bone formation. Unfortunately, these laboratory values have been generally described in only postmenopausal or corticosteroid-associated osteoporosis and have not been validated in patients who require long-term PN.

The best method to assess a mineralization defect in bone and establish the diagnosis of osteomalacia is by bone biopsy after double tetracycline labeling. This method is an effective tool in measuring bone growth or regression; however, it is invasive and expensive.16 Double tetracycline labeling involves a patient ingesting 2 doses of the antibiotic tetracycline at a specific interval. The tetracycline is absorbed onto the surface of existing bone structure. By spacing the doses of tetracycline, one can view deposition of a dose in the skeleton, the subsequent skeletal growth activity over time, and then the second layer of drug deposition. By measuring growth between the first and second doses, physicians can gain information as to the activity of skeletal structure within a given time frame. Histologic examination of bone tissue is necessary for diagnosis because patients may have a mixed picture of osteomalacia and osteoporosis.17,18 Osteomalacia may be present without associated clinical, radiologic, or biochemical abnormalities.17 Adults afflicted with osteomalacia have also reported more clinically apparent bone pain, especially in the periarticular areas of weight-bearing joints.12,13

Osteopenia or fractures either as an incidental radiographic finding or as reported by patient symptoms are the most common adult presentation of MBD. Osteoporosis and osteopenia are best diagnosed by direct assessment of BMD with DXA. This modality uses low-dose radiation to measure the BMD of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and radius.19 The BMD of the individual is compared with that of a control group composed of young, gender-matched adults. Any deviation from control is expressed as standard deviations (SDs) above or below the mean and referred to as a T score, or classification of osteoporosis fracture risk. The World Health Organization has defined a T score of –1 SD or above as normal, a T score between –1 and –2.5 SDs as osteopenia, and a T score at or below –2.5 SDs as osteoporosis.20 Repeated measurements are generally performed every 1–3 years if DXA results are normal.


    Etiology and Pathophysiology
 Top
 Bone Physiology
 Clinical Presentation and...
 Etiology and Pathophysiology
 Management
 Conclusion
 
MBD associated with long-term PN was first described in the 1980s.1214,21 Several PN-related factors that may increase the risk of reduced bone mass include nutrient and mineral deficiencies, excessive urinary calcium excretion, metabolic acidosis, high aluminum concentrations in PN, medications, and underlying medical conditions.

Deficiencies in Calcium and Phosphorus
The single most important contributor to bone disease is a negative calcium balance. This can occur during PN therapy when there is inadequate calcium provision coupled with an increase in urinary calcium excretion.22,23 Calcium and phosphorus are essential minerals for bone structure, and they are predominantly stored in the skeleton. Decreased intake of these electrolytes causes gradual bone erosion, in addition to delaying skeletal growth in pediatric patients who are dependent on receiving PN.

Adequate supplementation of calcium and phosphorus in PN solutions has been a continual problem. The risk of calcium-phosphate precipitation in solution limits the amounts of these electrolytes that can be provided in PN. This is particularly prevalent in solutions for neonates because their calcium and phosphorus needs are high, yet fluid requirements are restricted.24,25 Factors that can enhance precipitation in PN admixtures include high calcium and phosphorus concentrations, decreased amino acid concentration, increased environmental temperature, elevated pH and prolonged hang time of the PN solution.2628 Calcium-phosphate solubility curves (Figure 1) are routinely used to identify potential solubility complications in PN. A clinical pharmacist trained in the compounding of PN solutions and interpreting these graphs can assist the clinician in maximizing the calcium and phosphorus concentrations for a prescribed regimen.


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. An example of a calcium-phosphate solubility curve. Curves are constructed by graphically plotting the concentration at which precipitation occurs in a given solution. Graphs are specific for given concentrations of amino acid, dextrose, and the presence or absence of cysteine.

 

Excessive Urinary Calcium Excretion
Normally, 10,000 mg of nonprotein-bound calcium is filtered by the kidney each day, with 99% of the filtered load being reabsorbed by the renal tubules.29 However, in patients receiving long-term PN, an increase in the urinary excretion of calcium has been reported.1214 Several factors contribute to the development of hypercalciuria in patients receiving PN.

Excessive dietary protein is known to enhance urinary calcium excretion and may lead to a negative calcium balance.30 The precise mechanism for this effect is unknown; however, calcium resorption by the renal tubules has been shown to decrease in response to a protein meal. Part of this effect may be related to sulfate excretion and insulin release, both of which occur with protein metabolism and are known to decrease renal calcium resorption.

Studies have revealed a dose-dependent correlation between the amounts of amino acids in PN and urinary calcium excretion. Bengoa et al31 infused a PN formula into infants with 1 g/kg/d of amino acids vs 2 g/kg/d and demonstrated a modest increase in urinary calcium from 287 ± 46 mg/d to 455 ± 58 mg/d. Concentrations of calcium, PTH, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D were normal and unchanged during the 3 weeks of study. The investigators suggested that the increase in hypercalciuria was partially due to an increase in glomerular filtration rate and perhaps a decrease in reabsorption. It is likely that increased levels of sulfate, titratable acid, and insulin all played a role in this observed increase. Other investigations have confirmed the correlation between amino acid intake and calciuria.32 It is also postulated that the infusion of intravenous (IV) amino acids causes an increased glomerular filtration rate or increased urinary acidity, which in turn decreases renal calcium resorption. The provision of amino acids with their low pH contributes significantly to the acidity of the PN solution. A high-protein load in PN formulas may play a role in hypercalciuria through mobilization of calcium carbonate stored in bone as a buffer for the acidic load generated in the metabolism of sulfur-containing and neutral amino acids. However, it is unknown whether the effects of amino acids on increasing urinary calcium excretion are related to their pH-lowering capacity or through other unidentified mechanisms.1,33

Metabolic Acidosis and Calcium Deficiency
The development of metabolic acidosis in patients receiving long-term PN may contribute to the genesis of MBD with features of osteomalacia. A chronic acidotic state could impair vitamin D metabolism or directly affect the bone buffering systems causing calcium and phosphorus to leach out of the bones. Patients with renal insufficiency, renal failure, or those experiencing chronic diarrhea and malabsorption due to short bowel syndrome (SBS) are at risk of developing chronic metabolic acidosis. Individuals with SBS and fistulas can lose large amounts of bicarbonate resulting in this imbalance of pH. The metabolism of excessive amounts of amino acids in PN or renal disease can also lead to metabolic acidosis, given that an abundance of weak phosphate and sulfate acids are synthesized and must be excreted by the kidney.

Lactic acidosis resulting from disordered gastrointestinal flora has also been linked to the development of osteomalacia and bone fractures in patients with SBS. Some patients receiving home PN may develop bacterial overgrowth syndrome, where the bacteria can produce D-lactate, a form of lactate that is not cleared from the body as readily as the normal L-lactate. Karton et al34 observed that patients with SBS receiving long-term PN had significant levels of serum and urine D-lactate. Evidence of decreased rate of bone formation and osteomalacia was revealed in the bone biopsies of these patients. It is unclear from this report whether chronic D-lactic acidosis will lead directly to bone loss; however, the report suggests that this may be a factor in some individuals.

Cyclic PN and Hypercalciuria
Patients receiving PN at home are commonly prescribed cyclic PN infusions. This delivery method allows the patient time away from the infusion pump and may reduce the risk of liver toxicity; however, cycling a PN solution may also enhance urinary calcium losses. A negative calcium balance with an 80% increase in urinary calcium excretion was reported during cyclic PN compared with losses associated with continuous PN infusion.35 Infusing PN over 18 and 12 hours caused 18% and 28% increases in urinary calcium elimination, respectively. Another study examined urinary calcium and magnesium excretion during 24- and 12-hour cyclic PN. The investigators reported an increase in urinary calcium and magnesium excretion during the 12-hour cycle, but the daily mean calcium and magnesium losses were equal for both the 24- and 12-hour solutions. It is possible that while higher calcium losses occur during the rapid infusion of a cyclic PN, this effect may be compensated by a lower urinary calcium excretion when the PN is not administered. While the exact cause of hypercalciuria during cyclic PN remains unknown, numerous factors are likely contributing to this effect.

Aluminum Contamination
The contamination of aluminum in PN solutions has been a concern for several decades because of its effect on bone metabolism. Elevated plasma, urine, and bone aluminum concentrations have been reported in infants with the administration of PN.36,37 Aluminum toxicity impairs PTH secretion, decreases serum levels of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and has been shown to result in a MBD similar to osteomalacia.38

Reports describing aluminum toxicity related to PN surfaced in the early 1980s when casein hydrolysate was used as a protein source. These particular solutions resulted in the infusion of 3400 µg/d of aluminum compared with 33 µg/d in solutions made with crystalline amino acids.36 Several studies in which patients received casein hydrolysates showed significant detectable amounts of aluminum in plasma, urine, and bone, compared with findings in patients receiving crystalline amino acid solutions. Adults receiving 2–3 mg of aluminum per day from casein hydrolysate PN solutions developed symptoms of bone pain within 2–36 months after initiation of PN.13,39 Reduced trabecular bone area and rate of bone formation were shown in iliac crest bone biopsies, along with an increased amount of stainable aluminum on bone biopsy and high plasma and urinary aluminum concentrations in patients exposed to casein hydrolysate solutions.3944 Discontinuation of PN resulted in reduction of bone pain and hypercalciuria, improvement in bone formation rate, and return of serum concentrations of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D to normal.

According to the above findings, some investigators have speculated that circulating aluminum reduces bone formation even before it accumulates in bone. Casein hydrolysate was withdrawn from the market in 1981 after these studies proved the formulation contained an unfavorable amount of aluminum. By changing from casein hydrolysates to crystalline amino acid solutions, patients receiving long-term PN showed a 50% reduction in plasma and urinary excretion aluminum levels.42,45

Phosphate salts, calcium salts, ascorbic acid, and heparin are now the primary offenders for aluminum contamination. Other additives used in PN solutions, including multivitamin and trace element preparations, amino acids, and magnesium salts, also contain various amounts of aluminum. In 1990, concerns were raised regarding the aluminum content in these parenteral products. By January 2000, an US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rule was proposed to require manufacturers to limit the concentration of aluminum in large-volume parenterals (LVPs), small-volume parenterals (SVPs) and pharmacy bulk packages (PBPs) to no more than 25 µg/L.46 The rule mandates that this maximum amount of aluminum at expiry be stated on the immediate container label for SVPs and PBPs. After an amendment in 2003 that allowed manufacturers to state "contains no more than 25 µg/L" on a label instead of listing the exact aluminum content, the rule became effective in July 2004. The final rule also states that labeling of LVPs, SVPs, and PBPs used for the compounding of PN must include a statement on aluminum contamination, particularly for patients with renal insufficiency or prematurity. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) does not have any specific standards regarding aluminum content in PN admixtures and considers the rule to apply to manufacturers and not pharmacists.46,47

The prevalence of PN-MBD secondary to aluminum toxicity is now considerably lower given that current PN solutions contain far less aluminum concentrations compared to admixtures prepared 2 decades ago. This has been corroborated by a report of the metabolic abnormalities associated with PN-MBD that did not find the marked hypercalciuria, hypercalcemia, and low 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels previously attributable to aluminum.21 However, this cause should not be dismissed when encountering chronic PN patients who develop MBD and present with concomitant renal insufficiency or immature renal function.

Vitamin D Requirements
The 3 primary regulators of calcium homeostasis are vitamin D, PTH, and calcitonin. Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin, essential for normal skeletal maintenance and development. The principal actions of vitamin D are to increase intestinal calcium and phosphorus absorption, and to enhance renal tubular calcium reabsorption. In addition, vitamin D itself may play a role in maintaining skeletal integrity. Vitamin D receptors are present in bone cells. When vitamin D binds to these receptors, osteoclast formation and bone resorption are induced.48 This process is necessary for normal bone turnover. The role for vitamin D in bone mineralization is less clear. It appears to indirectly promote bone mineralization via maintenance of extracellular calcium and phosphorus concentrations in a supersaturated state but is otherwise not directly involved in the bone mineralization process.49

Bone loss associated with vitamin D deficiency has long been recognized. Vitamin D deficiency results in osteomalacia in adults and rickets in children.18 Patients with chronic renal failure, liver failure, or malabsorption syndromes are at increased risk for vitamin D deficiency. Although this has little importance in the patient who receives IV vitamin D, patients may have developed vitamin D deficiency before initiation of PN. For example, vitamin D deficiency is not uncommon in patients with Crohn's disease and is usually related to steatorrhea associated with deficient bile salt reabsorption.50 Relatively brief sunlight exposure, in the absence of sunscreen use, will provide most if not all of the daily vitamin D requirements.50 Some home PN patients avoid outdoor activities; therefore, their sole source for vitamin D may be PN.

In patients receiving chronic PN, the possibility of vitamin D toxicity causing MBD has been raised. The dose of vitamin D usually added to adult PN formulas is 200 IU/d. Dosages for children are higher and range from 260 IU/d to 400 IU/d, depending on the body weight of the patient. Anecdotal reports of withdrawal of vitamin D from PN suggest improvement in the signs and symptoms of MBD. In these studies, the short-term withdrawal of vitamin D led to corrections of hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, and osteomalacia.

Improvement in bone disease following withdrawal of vitamin D was first observed by Shike et al.12 Shike and colleagues51 further examined the effect of removing vitamin D for 6 months from PN solutions in 11 patients. Patients experienced relief of MBD symptoms, including hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, bone fractures, and pain, as well as a significant reduction in osteoid index, with increased bone mineralization on bone biopsy. However, these patients may have had secondary hyperparathyroidism before starting PN in which bone metabolism was already impaired. It is also possible that relatively high concentrations of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D resulted in an increase in bone resorption.52 In another investigation where vitamin D was withdrawn for an average of 4.5 years, Verhage et al53 demonstrated improvement in bone mineral content of the lumbar spine and normalization of blood PTH and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. Serum levels of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D were found to be in the normal range at the start of the study and remained so during the time that vitamin D was withheld. Larchet and colleagues54 explored the effects of discontinuing vitamin D in children receiving PN. This resulted in a marked decrease in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations into the vitamin D–deficient range, but serum concentrations of 1,25-hydroxyvitamin D, calcium, and phosphorus remained normal. There were no consistent changes in urine calcium and phosphorus excretion, and no apparent clinical effects were detected up to 2 years.

In summary, the vitamin D requirement is minimal for patients requiring PN and does not seem to be greater than the recommended dose for patients receiving a normal diet. Because it is well known that chronic vitamin D deficiency can result in bone disease, it would seem prudent to maintain normal vitamin D status in patients receiving PN. This practice complements the general goal of maximizing the absorption and retention of any enteral nutrients tolerated by these patients because the vitamin D metabolite promotes the intestinal absorption of calcium and phosphorus. In addition, it is not possible to remove vitamin D from a PN solution and still provide appropriate amounts of the remaining 12 vitamins. Thus, until further evidence becomes available, complete discontinuation of vitamin D supplementation for patients requiring PN is not recommended.

Vitamin K Deficiency
Osteocalcin, matrix Gla protein, and protein S are vitamin K–dependent proteins involved in bone formation.55 Osteocalcin accounts for 15%–20% of all noncollagenous proteins in bone. Most of the daily requirement for vitamin K is synthesized by normal gut flora.56 Vitamin K is also present in IV fat emulsion (IVFE) and is now regularly supplied to adult PN patients at a dose of 150 µg/d from IV multivitamin preparations.57,58

A deficiency in vitamin K may develop secondary to alteration of the colonic microflora from broad-spectrum antibiotic use, or may be associated with fat malabsorption. This reduction of vitamin K can result in an undercarboxylation of the vitamin K-dependent proteins involved in bone metabolism and lead to decreased bone mineralization.59 An investigation by Hodges et al60 examined elderly women with osteoporotic fractures and found lower serum vitamin K concentrations compared with levels in control subjects. Serum concentrations of undercarboxylated osteocalcin were inversely correlated with BMD and positively correlated with hip fractures. In another study, osteoporotic patients treated with vitamin K showed a decrease in bone loss and an increased concentration of bone formation markers.61 Recent work by Schoon et al62 revealed an inverse relationship between serum concentrations of undercarboxylated osteocalcin and BMD of the lumbar spine in 32 patients with longstanding Crohn's disease. Because the actual effects of vitamin K on bone mineralization and formation remain unclear, further studies are warranted.

Fluoride Exposure
A state of fluoride deficiency has been linked to the pathogenesis of MBD, and serum fluoride concentrations have been shown to correlate significantly with BMD in home PN patients.63 The effects of fluoride on bone metabolism are complex and depend on its serum concentration.64

A recent retrospective analysis of patients with SBS receiving home PN was conducted to ascertain the relationship between fluoride status with bone condition.65 This study revealed a strong positive correlation between serum fluoride concentrations and lumbar BMD but no correlation with femoral neck BMD. The investigators reported that femoral neck BMD at baseline and throughout the study was significantly lower than spine BMD. In fact, femoral BMD remained stable, whereas spinal BMD showed an overall increase. Although these results differ from those of Haderslev et al,66 who reported lower BMD over the duration of PN at both the femoral and the spinal sites, these discrepancies could be related to the high fluoride concentrations found in the patients of this current study.65 The high intakes of fluoride are frequent in this patient population because of beverages ingested to compensate for stool and stoma losses. Therefore, the increase in BMD at lumbar sites in patients with SBS and PN-MBD could be related to high serum fluoride concentrations and the action of this electrolyte on trabecular bone formation, which increases cancellous bone density. This hypothesis is in agreement with the correlation observed between serum fluoride levels and the osteocalcin concentration, which is considered to be a sensitive and specific marker of osteoblastic activity. On the other hand, fluoride concentrations play no role in femoral BMD, because fluoride is known to have no effect on cortical bone density.64

Concurrent Medications
Medications may also play a role in the development of MBD. Patients with inflammatory or autoimmune disorders are frequently prescribed corticosteroids. The associated osteopenia resulting from the chronic use of these agents has been well described. These medications inhibit bone formation by suppressing osteoblast activity and decreasing type I collagen synthesis.67 A negative calcium balance is also created by the corticosteroids through reduced calcium absorption and increased calciuria; however, bone resorption is unaffected.68 Glucocorticoids may also inhibit the secretion of gonadotropin leading to a reduction in serum estrogen and androgen concentrations which contribute indirectly to further osteopenia. Patients receiving at least 10 mg of prednisone equivalents daily are at risk for corticosteroid-associated osteoporosis. While the loss of bone is most rapid during the first 6–12 months of therapy, accelerated bone loss can continue if therapy is extended beyond this time frame. Other medications utilized in the treatment of underlying inflammatory disorders such as methotrexate, cyclosporine, and tacrolimus can also contribute to the development of osteopenia.6971

Long-term heparin therapy (both standard and low-molecular-weight moieties) has been associated with decreased bone density and vertebral fractures.72,73 Unfortunately, the effects of heparin line flushes and addition of low-dose heparin to PN solutions have not been evaluated. Much of the information concerning the adverse effects of heparin on bone comes from studies of pregnant women requiring therapeutic anticoagulation.

Some home PN patients may receive warfarin as prophylactic therapy against catheter thrombosis or to treat a previously diagnosed thrombosis. The long-term use of this medication has been associated with a reduction in BMD, especially in rapidly growing bone as present in children, although this has not been demonstrated in all studies.7476

Concomitant Disease States
All patients presenting with disease states serious enough to warrant long-term PN have underlying medical issues. It is possible that patients could have varied defects in bone metabolism related to the differences among the disease states for which PN is indicated. Clinicians should be aware of the various pathologies associated with an increased risk of MBD. Examples of such disease states can include inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), cancer, amenorrhea, and SBS. These disorders can involve a disruption of normal bone metabolism, which may be linked to maldigestion and malabsorption of nutrients necessary for bone health.77

A common digestive disorder for which patients require PN is IBD. These patients are predisposed to develop MBD if they are malnourished, malabsorb nutrients such as calcium and vitamin D, or receive corticosteroids to control their disease. A large population-based cohort study of 6027 patients with IBD matched to healthy control subjects showed a 40% increased rate of fractures in this patient population.78 The fracture rate was the same in patients with Crohn's disease and those with ulcerative colitis (UC). The inflammatory process of the disease state itself has been suggested to play a role in the development of MBD. Cytokines are elevated in patients with active disease and these molecules stimulate osteoclast activity resulting in low BMD.7981 Many studies hypothesize that low BMD is often associated with the use of corticosteroids. Bishchoff et al82 reported that the prevalence of osteopenia and bone fracture was significantly correlated with cumulative corticosteroid dose and number of active phases of IBD. Abitbol and colleagues83 evaluated 84 patients with IBD, including 34 with Crohn's disease and 50 with UC. BMD by DXA showed osteopenia in 43% of patients, 52% of whom were receiving glucocorticoid treatment. Seven percent had vertebral fractures. A significant correlation between age, cumulative corticosteroid dose, low osteocalcin levels, and BMD of the spine was demonstrated. Haugeberg et al84 documented a 6%–8% reduction of BMD in patients with Crohn's disease compared with control subjects, and the use of corticosteroids was the only disease-related factor associated with low BMD. Another population-based study of patients with IBD matched with control subjects for sex and age showed reduced BMD in Crohn's disease vs UC.85 Disease extent, duration, and location did not influence the rate of low BMD in the 2 patient groups. However, corticosteroid use was significantly associated with low BMD in Crohn's disease but not in UC.

Women with chronic illnesses such as IBD may develop amenorrhea. Similarly, in the absence of supplementation, postmenopausal women who require home PN will also develop estrogen deficiency. This deficiency in estrogen appears to place women with Crohn's disease or severe malnutrition at a greater risk for the development of bone disease.86,87 Androgen deficiency is also associated with osteopenia in both men and women, probably because of defective osteoblast activity and reduced bone formation.88,89

Severe intestinal malabsorption can also increase the risk of bone abnormalities. Most calcium enters the body through the ingestion of lactose-containing products. Patients that require PN because of malabsorption secondary to SBS can therefore develop calcium deficiencies. Calcium malabsorption is often linked with steatorrhea, so patients with Crohn's disease or celiac sprue may even have preexisting calcium deficits.90 It is also possible that this deficit may have originated from lactose maldigestion prior to the initiation of PN.91 This deficiency can lead to a negative calcium balance and ultimately have a profound effect on skeletal health.

Paradoxically, the effects of underlying illnesses and associated nutrition deficiencies may become more prominent with improvement of the general nutrition status of the patient.4,41,92 For example, in infants, nutritional rickets tends to develop during the period of postnatal "catch-up" growth during recovery from serious illness.5,23 A similar observation is noted in adult patients where symptomatic bone disease can often occur after significant weight gain; however, the pain improves following discontinuation of the PN.13


    Management
 Top
 Bone Physiology
 Clinical Presentation and...
 Etiology and Pathophysiology
 Management
 Conclusion
 
Patients receiving chronic PN should be routinely assessed and monitored for MBD. Clinicians can monitor for physical signs of MBD by checking for a loss of height or reports of bone or back pain from their patients. DXA measurements can be obtained at baseline and repeated every 2–5 years in stable patients and every 12–18 months in individuals with newly diagnosed condition or those receiving pharmacotherapy affecting bone metabolism. If T scores are less than –1, the patient should be considered for referral to an endocrinologist for further evaluation and treatment. Quarterly to semiannual tests for serum levels of vitamin D and PTH may help to determine the need for modification of nutrient intake. In addition to these common clinical practices, the discussion below highlights supplemental details to assist in the management and therapy of PN-MBD.

Calcium and Phosphorus Intake
Failure to provide adequate calcium and phosphorus is critical in the development of nutrition-related bone disorders. Bone mineral retention correlates with calcium and phosphorus intake and the calcium:phosphorus ratio. Premature infants <34 weeks' gestation at birth or <1.5 kg birth weight are at particularly high risk for MBD. Major factors contributing to the development of MBD in this patient population are the inability to attain in utero mineral accretion rates and insufficient calcium and phosphorus administration via PN. The goal of therapy is to prevent MBD by maximizing calcium and phosphorus intake soon after birth. Ideally the intake of calcium and phosphorus should match intrauterine accretion rates. In infants, a calcium-phosphorus ratio of 1.7:1 (weight:weight) is optimal for adequate bone mineralization.93,94 Providing appropriate calcium:phosphorus amounts also decreases calciuria and promotes a positive calcium balance.

For adult patients, supplying at least 15 mEq calcium and 15 mmol phosphorus on a daily basis can promote retention of these elements. Sloan et al95 showed that these doses of calcium and phosphorus are needed in patients who are receiving continuous PN infusion. The participants of this study received weekly doses of vitamin D and nearly all of the patients had an underlying malignancy. Although the doses of calcium and phosphorus administered in this investigation may not be directly applicable to patients receiving long-term PN, it highlights the importance of providing an adequate amount of substrate for normal calcium metabolism. Wood et al35 showed that a positive calcium balance could be achieved when greater amounts of phosphorus are provided in a PN formula. Phosphorus appears to enhance calcium reabsorption by the renal tubules and this is independent of PTH, plasma calcium, and renal sodium handling. It should be noted that while high doses of phosphorus have been shown to reduce calciuria, chronic excess of this electrolyte can lead to bone loss as a result of secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Other PN Regimen Adjustments
Patients requiring PN are frequently malnourished and initially need high doses of amino acids to promote surgical wound healing and replace protein losses. Protein dosing should be reduced once nutrition status has returned to normal. Ideally, PN protein doses should not exceed 1.5 g/kg/d.31 This modification limits the development of chronic metabolic acidosis and uncontrolled hypercalciuria. PN formulas should also be adjusted with adequate amounts of acetate to normalize serum bicarbonate levels and prevent mobilization of calcium stores from bone to buffer the acid load. Injectable multivitamin preparations must be provided to patients to ensure adequate delivery of vitamin D supplementation. Finally, medication profiles and serum levels of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, and acetate should be monitored at least monthly to aid in the prevention of MBD.

Pharmacologic Treatment
The goal of treating osteoporosis is to reduce the incidence of fractures, especially those of the hip and spine. Therapy can be a combination of various available drugs and mineral supplements. One class of pharmacologic agents that is undergoing research for patients receiving chronic PN therapy is the antiresorptive agents.

Antiresorptive agents inhibit the action of osteoclasts, preserve bone structure, prevent further bone loss, and improve bone strength. Bisphosphonates are the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis and have proven effective in reducing fracture risk in women and men, as well as in patients with osteoporosis due to corticosteroid therapy. Bisphosphonates modify calcium metabolism and reduce bone marrow differentiation and the recruitment of osteoclast precursors, and also induce apoptosis of osteoclasts.96,97 These mechanisms result in a decreased number of osteoclasts and less bone resorption. The reduction in the risk of fracture during antiresorptive treatment is related to the magnitude of change in BMD and remodeling activity.98 Bisphosphonates are generally administered orally and are poorly absorbed from the intestines, which can be of particular concern in patients requiring PN due to intestinal failure and malabsorption. Gastrointestinal discomfort is also the most common side effect. Some bisphosphonates are available in IV form, which may provide a therapeutic option for patients with significant intestinal failure. Haderslev et al99 were the first to explore the benefits of an IV bisphosphonate in a group of patients receiving long-term PN who had evidence of abnormal BMD. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, the effects of IV clodronate, a bisphosphonate available in Europe, were compared with placebo. Biochemical markers of bone resorption were statistically lower in the bisphosphonate group, and a significant increase in BMD in the forearm was reported. Although BMD was also increased in the spine and hip, this result was not statistically significant. Nishikawa and colleagues100 demonstrated in 10 of 11 home PN patients with SBS that lumbar sacral DXA results improved while receiving IV pamidronate for decreased BMD. In another recent prospective trial that examined patients with a more diverse set of indications for home PN, Raman et al101 showed that BMD results had trends toward improvement via the mean T score of the spine and hip after IV pamidronate therapy. Although the results of the above research suggest promise for IV bisphosphonates, larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate the true efficacy of this medication.

The recombinant PTH teriparatide (Forteo; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN) is a subcutaneously administered anabolic agent approved by the FDA in 2002 for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at high risk for fractures. A recent clinical observation has been reported in the literature, describing the use of teriparatide in a patient with significantly low bone mass and receiving PN secondary to intestinal resection after radiation therapy.102 This case study reports normalization of BMD after 18 months of treatment in a patient with established osteoporosis. Although the causes of low BMD in this case are likely to be multifactorial and the increase in BMD by 2.5 SDs after treatment should be examined with caution, the case establishes an initial foundation on which our knowledge on the effects of bone anabolic agents can grow. Prospective studies are still needed to establish the use of intermittent PTH administration in patients requiring PN to prevent skeletal complications.


    Conclusion
 Top
 Bone Physiology
 Clinical Presentation and...
 Etiology and Pathophysiology
 Management
 Conclusion
 
The pathogenesis of PN-MBD is poorly understood and likely multifactorial. Patients receiving chronic PN often had debilitating primary disease and malnutrition that predispose them to derangements in bone metabolism. The role that toxic contaminants in artificial nutrition once played in this pathology has been markedly reduced over the past 2 decades; however, nutrient deficiencies and concurrent medications may still play a viable role in the origin of this bone disorder. Clinicians must remain vigilant when treating patients receiving chronic PN in order to provide them with a more healthy future. Additional investigations are also warranted in order to determine the utility of interventions designed to maintain and promote skeletal health.

  1. Hurley DL, McMahon MM. Long-term parenteral nutrition and metabolic bone disease. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am.1990; 19:113 –131.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Pironi L, Labate AM, Pertkiewicz M, et al; ESPEN-Home Artificial Nutrition Working Group. Prevalence of bone disease in patients on home parenteral nutrition. Clin Nutr.2002; 21:289 –296.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Cohen-Solal M, Baudoin C, Joly F, et al. Osteoporosis in patients on long-term home parenteral nutrition: a longitudinal study. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:1989 –1994.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Koo WW, Sherman R, Succop P, et al. Sequential bone mineral content in small preterm infants with and without fractures and rickets. J Bone Miner Res. 1988;3:193 –197.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Koo WW, Tsang R. Bone mineralization in infants. Prog Food Nutr Sci. 1984;8:229 –302.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Klein GL, Cannon RA, Diament M, et al. Infantile vitamin D-resistant rickets associated with total parenteral nutrition. Am J Dis Child. 1982;136:74 –76.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Toomey F, Hoag R, Batton D, Vain N. Rickets associated with cholestasis and parenteral nutrition in premature infants. Radiology.1982; 142:85 –88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Cannon RA, Byrne WJ, Ament ME, Gates B, O'Connor M, Fonkalsrud EW. Home parenteral nutrition in infants. J Pediatr.1980; 96:1098 –1104.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Watts NB. Clinical utility of biochemical markers of bone remodeling. Clin Chem.1999; 45:1359 –1368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Calvo MS, Eyre DR, Gundberg CM. Molecular basis and clinical application of biological markers of bone turnover. Endocr Rev. 1996;17:333 –368.[Abstract]
  11. Manolagas SC. Corticosteroids and fractures: a close encounter of the third cell kind. J Bone Miner Res.2000; 15:1001 –1005.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Shike M, Harrison JE, Sturtridge WC, et al. Metabolic bone disease in patients receiving long-term total parenteral nutrition. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92:343 –350.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Klein GL, Targoff CM, Ament ME, et al. Bone disease associated with total parenteral nutrition. Lancet.1980; 2:1041 –1044.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Shike M, Shils ME, Heller A, et al. Bone disease in prolonged parenteral nutrition: osteopenia without mineralization defect. Am J Clin Nutr. 1986;44:89 –98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ott SM, Kilcoyne RF, Chesnut CH 3rd. Ability of four different techniques of measuring bone mass to diagnose vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res.1987; 2:201 –210.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Anderson JB. Nutrition for bone health. In: Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S, eds. Krause's Food, Nutrition and Diet Therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 2000:611 –632.
  17. Wahner HW. Single- and dual-photon absorptiometry in osteoporosis and osteomalacia. Semin Nucl Med.1987; 17:305 –315.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Driscoll RH Jr, Meredith SC, Sitrin M, Rosenberg IH. Vitamin D deficiency and bone disease in patients with Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology.1982; 83:1252 –1258.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Lipkin EW. Metabolic bone disease. In: Rombeau JL, Rolandelli RH, eds. Clinical Nutrition: Parenteral Nutrition. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 2000:157 –171.
  20. World Health Organization. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser.1994; 843:1 –129.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Lipkin EW, Ott SM, Chesnut CH 3rd, Chait A. Mineral loss in the parenteral nutrition patient. Am J Clin Nutr.1988; 47:515 –523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Koo WW, Tsang RC, Succop P, Krug-Wispe SK, Babcock D, Oestreich AE. Minimal vitamin D and high calcium and phosphorus needs of preterm infants receiving parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1989;8:225 –233.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Koo WW, Sherman R, Succop P, et al. Fractures and rickets in very low birth weight infants: conservative management and outcome. J Pediatr Orthop. 1989;9:326 –330.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Fitzgerald KA, MacKay MW. Calcium and phosphate solubility in neonatal parenteral nutrient solutions containing TrophAmine. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986;43:88 –93.[Abstract]
  25. Knight P, Heer D, Abdenour G. CaxP and Ca/P in the parenteral feeding of preterm infants. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1983;7:110 –114.[Abstract]
  26. Niemiec PW Jr, Vanderveen TW. Compatibility considerations in parenteral nutrient solutions. Am J Hosp Pharm.1984; 41:893 –911.[Abstract]
  27. Poole RL, Rupp CA, Kerner JA Jr. Calcium and phosphorus in neonatal parenteral nutrition solutions. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1983;7:358 –360.[Abstract]
  28. Dunham B, Marcuard S, Khazanie PG, Meade G, Craft T, Nichols K. The solubility of calcium and phosphorus in neonatal total parenteral nutrition solutions. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.1991; 15:608 –611.[Abstract]
  29. Barrett EJ, Barrett P. The parathyroid glands and vitamin D. In: Boron WF, Boulpaep EL, eds. Medical Physiology: A Cellular and Molecular Approach. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders;2003 : 1086–1102.
  30. Kim Y, Linkswiler HM. Effect of level of protein intake on calcium metabolism and on parathyroid and renal function in the adult human male. J Nutr. 1979;109:1399 –1404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Bengoa JM, Sitrin MD, Wood RJ, Rosenberg IH. Amino acid-induced hypercalciuria in patients on total parenteral nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983;38:264 –269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. de Vernejoul MC, Messing B, Modrowski D, Bielakoff J, Buisine A, Miravet L. Multifactorial low remodeling bone disease during cyclic total parenteral nutrition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.1985; 60:109 –113.[Abstract]
  33. Goodman AD, Lemann J Jr, Lennon EJ, Relman AS. Production, excretion, and net balance of fixed acid in patients with renal acidosis. J Clin Invest.1965; 44:495 –506.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Karton MA, Rettmer R, Lipkin EW, Ott SM, Chait A. D-lactate and metabolic bone disease in patients receiving long-term parenteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.1989; 13:132 –135.[Abstract]
  35. Wood RJ, Bengoa JM, Sitrin MD, Rosenberg IH. Calciuretic effect of cyclic versus continuous total parenteral nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985;41:614 –619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Klein GL, Alfrey AC, Miller NL, et al. Aluminum loading during total parenteral nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr.1982; 35:1425 –1429.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Ott SM, Maloney NA, Klein GL, et al. Aluminum is associated with low bone formation in patients receiving chronic parenteral nutrition. Ann Intern Med.1983; 98:910 –914.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Goodman WG, Henry DA, Horst R, Nudelman RK, Alfrey AC, Coburn JW. Parenteral aluminum administration in the dog, II: induction of osteomalacia and effect on vitamin D metabolism. Kidney Int.1984; 25:370 –375.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Foldes J, Rimon B, Muggia-Sullam M, et al. Progressive bone loss during long-term home total parenteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1990;14:139 –142.[Abstract]
  40. Klein GL, Alfrey AC, Shike M, Sherrard DJ. Aluminum and TPN-related bone disease. Am J Clin Nutr.1992; 55:483 –485.[Free Full Text]
  41. Nomura K, Noguchi Y, Yoshikawa T, et al. Long-term total parenteral nutrition and osteoporosis: report of a case. Surg Today. 1993;23:1027 –1031.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Vargas JH, Klein GL, Ament ME, et al. Metabolic bone disease of total parenteral nutrition: course after changing from casein to amino acids in parenteral solutions with reduced aluminum content. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988;48:1070 –1078.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Sedman AB, Klein GL, Merritt RJ, et al. Evidence of aluminum loading in infants receiving intravenous therapy. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:1337 –1343.[Abstract]
  44. Koo WW, Kaplan LA, Bendon R, et al. Response to aluminum in parenteral nutrition during infancy. J Pediatr.1986; 109:877 –883.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Klein GL, Coburn JW. Total parenteral nutrition and its effects on bone metabolism. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci.1994; 31:135 –167.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Young D. FDA aluminum rule poses challenges for industry, pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm.2004; 61:742 –744.[Free Full Text]
  47. Gura KM, Puder M. Recent developments in aluminium contamination of products used in parenteral nutrition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2006;9:239 –246.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Bar-Shavit Z, Teitelbaum SL, Reitsma P, et al. Induction of monocytic differentiation and bone resorption by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA.1983; 80:5907 –5911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Holick MF. Vitamin D. In: Shils ME, Shike M, eds. Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:376 –395.
  50. Lo CW, Paris PW, Holick MF. Indian and Pakistani immigrants have the same capacity as Caucasians to produce vitamin D in response to ultraviolet irradiation. Am J Clin Nutr.1986; 44:683 –685.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Shike M, Sturtridge WC, Tam CS, et al. A possible role of vitamin D in the genesis of parenteral-nutrition-induced metabolic bone disease. Ann Intern Med.1981; 95:560 –568.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Vieth R. The mechanisms of vitamin D toxicity. Bone Miner. 1990;11:267 –272.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Verhage AH, Cheong WK, Allard JP, Jeejeebhoy KN. Harry M. Vars Research Award: increase in lumbar spine bone mineral content in patients on long-term parenteral nutrition without vitamin D supplementation. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.1995; 19:431 –436.[Abstract]
  54. Larchet M, Garabedian M, Bourdeau A, Gorski AM, Goulet O, Ricour C. Calcium metabolism in children during long-term total parenteral nutrition: the influence of calcium, phosphorus, and vitamin D intakes. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.1991; 13:367 –375.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Maillard C, Berruyer M, Serre CM, Dechavanne M, Delmas PD. Protein-S, a vitamin K-dependent protein, is a bone matrix component synthesized and secreted by osteoblasts. Endocrinology.1992; 130:1599 –1604.[Abstract]
  56. Conly JM, Stein K, Worobetz L, Rutledge-Harding S. The contribution of vitamin K2 (menaquinones) produced by the intestinal microflora to human nutritional requirements for vitamin K. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:915 –923.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Camilo ME, Jatoi A, O'Brien M, et al. Bioavailability of phylloquinone from an intravenous lipid emulsion. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;67:716 –721.[Abstract]
  58. Lennon C, Davidson KW, Sadowski JA, Mason JB. The vitamin K content of intravenous lipid emulsions. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1993;17:142 –144.[Abstract]
  59. Sokoll LJ, Sadowski JA. Comparison of biochemical indexes for assessing vitamin K nutritional status in a healthy adult population. Am J Clin Nutr.1996; 63:566 –573.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Hodges SJ, Akesson K, Vergnaud P, Obrant K, Delmas PD. Circulating levels of vitamins K1 and K2 decreased in elderly women with hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res.1993; 8:1241 –1245.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  61. Shiraki M, Shiraki Y, Aoki C, Miura M. Vitamin K2 (menatetrenone) effectively prevents fractures and sustains lumbar bone mineral density in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res.2000; 15:515 –521.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  62. Schoon EJ, Muller MC, Vermeer C, Schurgers LJ, Brummer RJ, Stockbrugger RW. Low serum and bone vitamin K status in patients with longstanding Crohn's disease: another pathogenetic factor of osteoporosis in Crohn's disease? Gut.2001; 48:473 –477.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Moukarzel ABA, Vargas J, Baron HI, Ament ME. Is fluoride deficiency related to the bone disease of parenteral nutrition? [abstract] Gastroenterology.1992; 102:A568 .
  64. Caverzasio J, Palmer G, Bonjour JP. Fluoride: mode of action. Bone. 1998;22:585 –589.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  65. Bouletreau PH, Bost M, Fontanges E, et al. Fluoride exposure and bone status in patients with chronic intestinal failure who are receiving home parenteral nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr.2006; 83:1429 –1437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Haderslev KV, Tjellesen L, Haderslev PH, Staun M. Assessment of the longitudinal changes in bone mineral density in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.2004; 28:289 –294.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. LoCascio V, Bonucci E, Imbimbo B, et al. Bone loss in response to long-term glucocorticoid therapy. Bone Miner.1990; 8:39 –51.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  68. Reid IR, Ibbertson HK. Evidence for decreased tubular reabsorption of calcium in glucocorticoid-treated asthmatics. Horm Res. 1987;27:200 –204.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  69. Gnudi S, Butturini L, Ripamonti C, Avella M, Bacci G. The effects of methotrexate (MTX) on bone: a densitometric study conducted on 59 patients with MTX administered at different doses. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1988;14:227 –231.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  70. Sambrook PN, Kelly PJ, Keogh AM, et al. Bone loss after heart transplantation: a prospective study. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1994;13:116 –120.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  71. Cvetkovic M, Mann GN, Romero DF, et al. The deleterious effects of long-term cyclosporine A, cyclosporine G, and FK506 on bone mineral metabolism in vivo. Transplantation.1994; 57:1231 –1237.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  72. Goldhaber P. Heparin enhancement of factors stimulating bone resorption in tissue culture. Science.1965; 147:407 –408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Douketis JD, Ginsberg JS, Burrows RF, Duku EK, Webber CE, Brill-Edwards P. The effects of long-term heparin therapy during pregnancy on bone density: a prospective matched cohort study. Thromb Haemost. 1996;75:254 –257.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  74. Fiore CE, Tamburino C, Foti R, Grimaldi D. Reduced axial bone mineral content in patients taking an oral anticoagulant. South Med J. 1990;83:538 –542.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  75. Pauli RM, Lian JB, Mosher DF, Suttie JW. Association of congenital deficiency of multiple vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors and the phenotype of the warfarin embryopathy: clues to the mechanism of teratogenicity of coumarin derivatives. Am J Hum Genet. 1987;41:566 –583.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  76. Rosen HN, Maitland LA, Suttie JW, Manning WJ, Glynn RJ, Greenspan SL. Vitamin K and maintenance of skeletal integrity in adults. Am J Med. 1993;94:62 –68.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  77. Lipkin EW. Metabolic bone disease in gut diseases. Gastroenterol Clin North Am.1998; 27:513 –523.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  78. Bernstein CN, Blanchard JF, Leslie W, Wajda A, Yu BN. The incidence of fracture among patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based cohort study. Ann Intern Med.2000; 133:795 –799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Nielsen OH, Vainer B, Madsen SM, Seidelin JB, Heegaard NH. Established and emerging biological activity markers of inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol.2000; 95:359 –367.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  80. Gross V, Andus T, Caesar I, Roth M, Scholmerich J. Evidence for continuous stimulation of interleukin-6 production in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology.1992; 102:514 –519.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  81. Jilka RL. Cytokines, bone remodeling, and estrogen deficiency: a 1998 update. Bone.1998; 23:75 –81.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  82. Bischoff SC, Herrmann A, Goke M, Manns MP, von zur Muhlen A, Brabant G. Altered bone metabolism in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol.1997; 92:1157 –1163.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  83. Abitbol V, Roux C, Chaussade S, et al. Metabolic bone assessment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology.1995; 108:417 –422.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  84. Haugeberg G, Vetvik K, Stallemo A, Bitter H, Mikkelsen B, Stokkeland M. Bone density reduction in patients with Crohn disease and associations with demographic and disease variables: cross-sectional data from a population-based study. Scand J Gastroenterol.2001; 36:759 –765.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  85. Jahnsen J, Falch JA, Aadland E, Mowinckel P. Bone mineral density is reduced in patients with Crohn's disease but not in patients with ulcerative colitis: a population based study. Gut.1997; 40:313 –319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  86. Robinson RJ, Iqbal SJ, Abrams K, Al-Azzawi F, Mayberry JF. Increased bone resorption in patients with Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998;12:699 –705.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  87. Lindsay R, Hart DM, Forrest C, Baird C. Prevention of spinal osteoporosis in oophorectomised women. Lancet.1980; 2:1151 –1154.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  88. Murphy S, Khaw KT, Cassidy A, Compston JE. Sex hormones and bone mineral density in elderly men. Bone Miner.1993; 20:133 –140.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  89. Takeuchi M, Kakushi H, Tohkin M. Androgens directly stimulate mineralization and increase androgen receptors in human osteoblast-like osteosarcoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun.1994; 204:905 –911.[CrossRef]